Search details
1.
Benefit-to-radiation-risk of low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening.
Cancer
; 130(2): 216-223, 2024 Jan.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37909872
2.
Outcomes of Breast Cancer Screening Strategies Based on Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network Estimates.
Radiology
; 310(2): e232658, 2024 Feb.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38376405
3.
Age distributions of breast cancer diagnosis and mortality by race and ethnicity in US women.
Cancer
; 127(23): 4384-4392, 2021 Dec 01.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34427920
4.
Breast Cancer Mortality Rates Have Stopped Declining in U.S. Women Younger than 40 Years.
Radiology
; 299(1): 143-149, 2021 04.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33560186
5.
Breast cancer deaths averted over 3 decades.
Cancer
; 125(9): 1482-1488, 2019 05 01.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30740647
6.
Improving the diagnostic accuracy of a stratified screening strategy by identifying the optimal risk cutoff.
Cancer Causes Control
; 30(10): 1145-1155, 2019 Oct.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31377875
7.
Obligate Overdiagnosis Due to Mammographic Screening: A Direct Estimate for U.S. Women.
Radiology
; 287(2): 391-397, 2018 May.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29267146
8.
Current Issues in the Overdiagnosis and Overtreatment of Breast Cancer.
AJR Am J Roentgenol
; 210(2): 285-291, 2018 Feb.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29091010
9.
Screening Mammography in Women 40-49 Years Old: Current Evidence.
AJR Am J Roentgenol
; 210(2): 264-270, 2018 Feb.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29064760
10.
Comparison of recommendations for screening mammography using CISNET models.
Cancer
; 123(19): 3673-3680, 2017 Oct 01.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28832983
11.
Benefit to Radiation Risk of Breast-specific Gamma Imaging Compared with Mammography in Screening Asymptomatic Women with Dense Breasts.
Radiology
; 281(2): 583-588, 2016 Nov.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27257949
12.
Reduction in late-stage breast cancer incidence in the mammography era: Implications for overdiagnosis of invasive cancer.
Cancer
; 120(17): 2649-56, 2014 Sep 01.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24840597
13.
Implications of CISNET modeling on number needed to screen and mortality reduction with digital mammography in women 40-49 years old.
AJR Am J Roentgenol
; 203(6): 1379-81, 2014 Dec.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25415718
14.
Mammography Screening Should Begin at Age 40 Years.
J Breast Imaging
; 6(2): 116-123, 2024 Apr 01.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38280219
15.
Reply to Distinguishing between CISNET model results versus CISNET models.
Cancer
; 124(5): 1084, 2018 03 01.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29278431
16.
Reply to Opportunity cost of annual screening mammography.
Cancer
; 124(6): 1298-1299, 2018 03 15.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29266244
17.
Combination of one-view digital breast tomosynthesis with one-view digital mammography versus standard two-view digital mammography: per lesion analysis.
Eur Radiol
; 23(8): 2087-94, 2013 Aug.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23620367
18.
Performance comparison of single-view digital breast tomosynthesis plus single-view digital mammography with two-view digital mammography.
Eur Radiol
; 23(3): 664-72, 2013 Mar.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22976919
19.
Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results of a multireader, multicase study.
Breast Cancer Res
; 14(3): R94, 2012 Jun 14.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22697607
20.
Mammography and the risk of thyroid cancer.
AJR Am J Roentgenol
; 198(3): 705-7, 2012 Mar.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22358013